Current:Home > NewsFormat of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents -Momentum Wealth Path
Format of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:47:53
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline are taking issue with the format of private oral testimony in meetings for public comment on a draft environmental review of the controversial pipeline.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the midst of two public comment meetings in Bismarck, North Dakota, the first held Wednesday, the second set for Thursday. People wishing to give testimony may do so orally in a curtained area with a stenographer, or do so in writing at tables.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has long opposed the pipeline due to the risk of an oil spill contaminating the tribe’s drinking water supply. The four-state pipeline crosses under the Missouri River just upstream of the tribe’s reservation.
The long-awaited draft environmental review, released in September, outlines five options for the pipeline’s fate. Those include denying the easement for the controversial crossing and removing or abandoning a 7,500-foot (2,286-meter) segment, or granting the easement with no changes or with additional safety measures. A fifth option is to reroute the pipeline north of Bismarck, which would require new state, local and federal permits.
Many opponents of the pipeline had hoped Wednesday’s meeting would have allowed them to publicly question the Corps and pipeline developer Energy Transfer, The Bismarck Tribune reported.
Joe Lafferty, a Native American activist who opposes the pipeline, poured oil and water into a cup and challenged Corps officials to take a drink.
“If it means so much to you, I want you, DAPL, Army Corps of Engineers, drink this water with oil in it and then maybe, as a Lakota I’ll consider your request,” Lafferty said. His demonstration did not count as official testimony.
Republican state Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, who sits on a state panel that regulates oil and gas, said the meeting was a fair process.
“I heard a comment saying, ‘This is no democratic way’ -- why, I think it very much is because you get a chance to say your piece,” he said.
About 150 to 200 people attended Wednesday’s meeting, Corps spokesperson Steve Wolf told The Associated Press. About 80 people gave oral testimony, taken down by two stenographers, which Wolf said enabled the Corps to receive more comments. The Corps received about 50 written comments.
“I understand the fact that some people want to be performative and try to create some kind of a fanfare in front of an audience of people, but that’s not the spirit and intent of the law or the meeting,” Wolf told the AP. The Corps is “absolutely on the right side of the law in how we’re doing this,” he said.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire last month called for the draft review to be invalidated, with a new one begun and the pipeline shut down.
A virtual meeting with only tribes is set for Nov. 8. The public comment meetings should be held on the reservation, said Peter Capossela, one of Standing Rock’s attorneys. The Bismarck meetings are more convenient for corporate executives and state officials than for tribal members who live as far as 120 miles (190 kilometers) away, he said.
“If the Army Corps is genuinely interested in hearing the views of tribal members and learning about the potential environmental impacts of an oil spill at the DAPL/Lake Oahe crossing, it would have held public hearings on the reservation that’s going to be polluted by a spill,” Capossela told the AP.
Wolf said the Corps is “being as open and transparent as we can possibly be through all of this, and nobody is being excluded from anything by us.”
State government and oil industry leaders view the pipeline as crucial infrastructure and the safest method for transporting oil, rather than by rail. Officials such as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and U.S. Sen. John Hoeven have said they prefer the pipeline to continue operating as it has.
The public comment period ends Dec. 13. A final decision whether to grant or deny the easement is expected in late 2024.
veryGood! (774)
Related
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Big Agriculture and the Farm Bureau Help Lead a Charge Against SEC Rules Aimed at Corporate Climate Transparency
- Man who ambushed Fargo officers searched kill fast, area events where there are crowds, officials say
- A regional sports network bankruptcy means some baseball fans may not see games on TV
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- New Mexico Wants it ‘Both Ways,’ Insisting on Environmental Regulations While Benefiting from Oil and Gas
- The life and possible death of low interest rates
- Elon Musk says NPR's 'state-affiliated media' label might not have been accurate
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Peter Thomas Roth Deal: Get 2 Rose Stem Cell Masks for the Price of 1
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- This Leakproof Water Bottle With 56,000+ Perfect Amazon Ratings Will Become Your Next Travel Essential
- Corn-Based Ethanol May Be Worse For the Climate Than Gasoline, a New Study Finds
- Judge rebukes Fox attorneys ahead of defamation trial: 'Omission is a lie'
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Why Richard Branson's rocket company, Virgin Orbit, just filed for bankruptcy
- Laid off on leave: Yes, it's legal and it's hitting some workers hard
- Ron DeSantis threatens Anheuser-Busch over Bud Light marketing campaign with Dylan Mulvaney
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
New Research Shows Aerosol Emissions May Have Masked Global Warming’s Supercharging of Tropical Storms
5 things to know about Saudi Arabia's stunning decision to cut oil production
About 1 in 10 young adults are vaping regularly, CDC report finds
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
As States Move to Electrify Their Fleets, Activists Demand Greater Environmental Justice Focus
Airline passengers could be in for a rougher ride, thanks to climate change
Amid Punishing Drought, California Is Set to Adopt Rules to Reduce Water Leaks. The Process has Lagged